Councils warn they have no legal powers to enforce ‘local lockdowns’Local authorities ask ministers

Matt Hancock told the Downing Street press briefing on 26 May that the launch of the NHS test-and-trace system would allow ‘local lockdowns’.

Councils do not have the legal powers to enforce a “local lockdown” across a city, town or neighbourhood to prevent clusters of coronavirus cases spreading widely into the community, local authority leaders have warned. They called on ministers to urgently spell out what a local lockdown might mean in practical terms or risk a local outbreak spreading out of control, at a hearing of a parliamentary committee. Greg Fell, director of public health for Sheffield, said that while councils did have the power to act to control smaller outbreaks “in a school or a workplace or a care home” by, for example ordering them to close, that did not apply for larger areas. “If we get to a scenario whereby we need to close down Fulwood in Sheffield or close down Sheffield, I don’t think we have the powers to do that at local authority level,” Fell told MPs on the communities committee. “But by the time we get to needing to close down Sheffield, we will be in widespread community transmission again, so I think we may well be in national lockdown territory by that time. So I think the government actually needs to answer what does local lockdown mean.”

Last month, Matt Hancock, the health secretary said that the launch of the NHS test-and-trace system on 1 June – designed to track coronavirus cases – would allow for “local lockdowns” in an attempt to suppress outbreaks in the future.

Ministers hope that by rolling out testing across the country and tracing the contacts of those who turn out positive it will become possible to monitor the emergence of hotspots, but it is unclear if the model can work in practice.

Cllr Ian Hudspeth, the Conservative leader of Oxfordshire county council, told the MPs that he believed it would be possible to obtain the legal power to shut down an area or city from Whitehall’s Cobra emergency committee.

But by then, Hudspeth added, “that passage of time has not been assisting,” meaning that the contagious disease could easily have spread out of control. “It’d be interesting for [central] government to confirm what is meant by the local lockdown,” he added, including “clear guidance as to those powers and what is expected of us”.

Advertisement

Several witnesses to the committee also said they had been given no launch date for the NHS contact tracing app, which was intended to be at the heart of the system when it was announced by Hancock several weeks ago.

Coronavirus UK map: the latest deaths and confirmed Covid-19 cases

It has been repeatedly delayed for technical reasons, while it is tested on the Isle of Wight, and Fell told the committee that in Sheffield “we are building our plans around the app not being available to us” adding that in the past “contact tracing has been done by skilled humans, in a food poisoning outbreak, in a sexual health related outbreaks”.

Tom Riordan, chief executive of Leeds city council, who is working with the Department of Health to bring together national and local contact tracing systems, said there was “no specific date at the moment” for the launch of the app “but I think it is in the next few weeks”.

The app, he said, would be particularly useful as people returned to work in greater numbers, using public transport. “It will cover those people who you didn’t know you were near,” Riordan added.

With those in power failing us … … at this historic moment, we demand better. From the coronavirus pandemic and police brutality to the marginalisation of minority communities around the world, leadership is broken. Devoid of the humility and inclusivity we so desperately need, and given to narcissism, leaders are gambling with public health, safety and the future of younger generations. They unapologetically prioritise serving themselves over the people they were elected to serve. We have to make them raise their game. That’s what the Guardian’s here for. As an open, independent news organisation we investigate, interrogate and expose the incompetence and indifference of those in power, without fear. Our journalism is free from political and commercial bias – this makes us different. We can give a voice to the oppressed and neglected, and stand in solidarity with with those who are calling for a fairer future. With your help we can bring about improvement. Millions are flocking to the Guardian for quality news every day. We believe everyone deserves access to information that is fact-checked, and analysis that has authority and integrity. That’s why, unlike many others, we made a choice: to keep Guardian reporting open for all, regardless of where they live or what they can afford to pay. We’re determined to provide journalism that helps each of us better understand the world, and take actions that challenge, unite, and inspire change – in times of crisis and beyond. Our work would not be possible without our readers, who now support our work from 180 countries around the world. But news organisations are facing an existential threat. With advertising revenues plummeting, the Guardian risks losing a major source of its funding. More than ever before, we’re reliant on financial support from readers to fill the gap. Your support keeps us independent, open, and means we can maintain our high quality reporting – investigating, disentangling and interrogating.