In the UK and across Europe, Jewish and Muslim communities make significant contributions to society through their dedication, skills, and commitment in fields, such as: education, healthcare, business, and public service. Their hard work strengthens the social and economic fabric of their countries and fosters vibrant, diverse communities. It is important to recognise that, in any community, a very small number of individuals may hold extreme views or engage in harmful behaviour. Holding entire groups responsible for the actions of a few is unfair and misrepresents the many moderate, law-abiding individuals working positively every day. Most Jewish and Muslim people are committed to promoting understanding, coexistence, and constructive engagement. Supporting law enforcement and security agencies — such as the police, local constabularies, British Transport Police, Royal Military Police, SO15 and Counter Terrorism, MI5/MI6/GCHQ, the Ministry of Defence Police, the military, Border Force, the National Crime Agency (NCA), border enforcement, immigration enforcement, intelligence agencies, Interpol, community engagement teams, and Prevent — is essential for tackling extremism effectively. These organisations work to identify and address threats while protecting the rights and safety of the wider population. By cooperating with and supporting these efforts, we help ensure that moderate religious individuals are not unfairly blamed for the actions of a few extremists. Constructive debate and discussion about social and political issues is vital in democratic societies. Criticism of ideas or policies can be productive, but it should never cross into hatred or discrimination against people because of their faith, ethnicity, or background. Most members of Jewish and Muslim communities actively speak out against extremism, reinforcing the principle that extremists do not represent the majority. Acknowledging the contributions of these communities and supporting law enforcement initiatives strengthens social cohesion, protects public safety, and fosters a society where individuals are judged by their actions, character, and contributions rather than stereotypes or assumptions. Through positive engagement and collaboration, we create a society in which everyone can thrive.

Dwayne Hards, LCN's Founder, began dating Brandon Rodda on June 29 2024, and they're soon due to celebrate their first anniversary in less than a month. They're the perfect match and said "they're madly in love with each other" and will always stick by each other's side. Dwayne Hards is currently 17 and was born on 07/08/2007, while Brandon Rodda is only one year older at 18 years old and was born on 04/08/2006. They're close in age, share many of the same views and interests, share maturity and common-sense political views, and appear to be inseparable and close to each other. They've both been through challenges together but have always worked them out together. Dwayne and Brandon have started making plans for their future together, such as: moving out, travelling, exploring the world, and more. Dwayne is even considering standing in an election. An 18-year-old TikTok creator, Brandon loves uploading TikToks of him dancing and his life with Dwayne, which Dwayne said is "really sweet and cute". His love for pop music fueled his desire to become an online creator. Dwayne also has a TikTok profile. Dwayne's relationship is partly why he hasn't uploaded much content to LCN lately, as well as life challenges and the fact he's creating a new self-hosted website from scratch and is soon moving out with Brandon. Finding the one at such a young age is a milestone achievement for us, and we're so happy in our relationship and will always be there through each other's good and bad.

Human rights may be at risk of police overreach after UK officers’ habit of unlawfully punishing auditors, journalists, and photographers in public. In recent years, a growing number of citizens across England, Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland have taken to auditing police activity — filming officers on duty, publicly recording police-station entrances, or documenting conduct in public places — as a means of holding law enforcement accountable. While these actions are often entirely lawful, many auditors report being detained, searched, or arrested without clear legal basis. Legal experts suggest that the root of the problem lies in a complex overlay of historic charters, statutory law, human rights treaties, and administrative guidance that officers may not fully understand. The right of citizens to hold the state accountable traces back centuries. The Magna Carta 1297 enshrined the principle that “No free man shall be… imprisoned… except by the lawful judgment of his equals or by the law of the land.” Clauses 39 and 40 guarantee due process and access to justice. The Charter of Liberties 1100 further constrained arbitrary government power, while the Petition of Right 1628 affirmed that the Crown must respect subjects’ rights, including the right to petition without fear of reprisal. The Bill of Rights 1689 explicitly recognised: “It is the right of the subjects to petition the King, and all commitments and prosecutions for such petitioning are illegal.” These historic instruments form the constitutional backdrop for modern auditing of police conduct. Modern UK law reinforces these rights through statutes such as the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (“PACE 1984”), which regulates stop, search, and arrest powers; the Criminal Justice Act 1972; and the Act of Settlement 1701, which ensures judicial independence. Common-law protections — such as the writ of habeas corpus  — also underpin the right not to be unlawfully deprived of liberty. Under common law, the doctrines of legality and proportionality demand that police powers be clearly defined and exercised only when necessary. In Mengesha v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis  [2013] EWHC 1695 (Admin), the High Court held that police had no lawful authority to require individuals to submit to filming or identification as a condition of release from containment [see CaseMine, 2013]. At the heart of modern accountability lies the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA), which incorporates the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) into UK law. Key rights include: Article 5: Right to liberty and security Article 6: Right to a fair trial Article 8: Right to respect for private and family life Article 10: Freedom of expression — covering filming and audiovisual recording in public Article 11: Freedom of assembly and association The UK is also bound by the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), both of which safeguard freedom of expression and due process. In the policing context, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has repeatedly held that covert filming and the retention of images without adequate safeguards may breach Article 8. In Peck v United Kingdom  [2003] EHRR 287, the Court found that the disclosure of CCTV footage violated Article 8. Similarly, in Perry v United Kingdom  [2003] 63737/00 (ECHR), covert filming at a police station was deemed an unlawful interference with private life [see LawTeacher.net , 2003; Lexploria, 2003]. Although the UK has left the European Union, the legacy of EU law remains significant. Under the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018, a substantial body of EU-derived law was retained, including data-protection principles stemming from the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the Data Protection Act 2018 (DPA 2018). The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruled on 4 May 2023 that Article 82 GDPR does not permit compensation for mere infringement of data-protection rights unless actual damage is proven [see Farrer & Co., 2023]. Earlier decisions had found the UK’s Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act 2014 (DRIPA) unlawful for permitting indiscriminate retention of personal data [see Hogan Lovells, 2016]. The European Commission has since confirmed that the UK continues to adhere to key safeguards under the DPA 2018 regime, though the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights no longer applies directly [see European Commission, 2021]. In Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland, devolved legal frameworks broadly mirror core constitutional and human-rights protections, albeit with jurisdictional nuances. For example, policing and public-order powers in Scotland fall under the Police and Fire Reform (Scotland) Act 2012, overseen by the Scottish Police Authority. Northern Ireland likewise maintains its own oversight bodies. Across all jurisdictions, the rights to freedom of expression and due process remain guaranteed under the ECHR and HRA 1998 and both local and UK-wide constitutional statutes/charters. Local authorities — including city and county councils — enact by-laws, surveillance codes, and public-space filming policies that must align with national statutes, human-rights obligations, and common law. Police guidance documents frequently reference these local policies when interacting with auditors or citizen journalists. National policing guidance explicitly affirms the public’s right to film in public: The National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC)  Guidance for Photographers  states: “There are no powers prohibiting the taking of photographs, film, or digital images in a public place. Therefore, members of the public and press should not be prevented from doing so.” [see NPCC, 2017]. The College of Policing (CoP)  Media Relations Authorised Professional Practice (APP)  similarly asserts: “Police have no power or moral responsibility to stop the filming or photographing of incidents or police personnel.". The CoP, APP Media Relations, and local force guidance — such as that issued by West Midlands Police — reiterates that, if a person is filming from a public place and not obstructing officers, they should be informed that they are not detained, are free to leave, and may continue filming. The guidance emphasizes: “There are no powers prohibiting people taking photographs or filming outside our buildings or in any other public place, and they should not be prevented from doing so.” [see West Midlands Police FOI, 2022]. Despite a clear legal and policy framework, auditors frequently report obstruction, detention, or searches by police. Typical incidents include: Being asked to delete or surrender recorded footage without lawful authority. Being detained or arrested for filming police-station entrances or officers in public spaces. Being searched under broad powers — for instance, under Terrorism Act 2000 sections 43 and 44 — where “reasonable suspicion” may not, in fact, be met. Such actions may give rise to claims for false imprisonment, misfeasance in public office, unlawful arrest or detention, and breaches of Articles 5 (liberty) and 10 (expression) of the ECHR via the HRA. Auditors who believe they have been unlawfully detained or searched may pursue several remedies: A civil claim in the High Court or County Court against the Chief Constable (or equivalent) for false imprisonment, assault or battery, or misfeasance in public office. A claim under the HRA for breach of Articles 5, 8, or 10. A complaint to the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) or equivalent professional-standards body. A data-protection claim under the DPA 2018/UK GDPR framework if footage or personal images were retained or processed unlawfully. Equivalent oversight and redress mechanisms exist in Scotland and Northern Ireland, though the procedures differ. Several factors contribute to the ongoing disconnect between law and practice: Many frontline officers lack full familiarity with the legal limits of their powers, particularly regarding public filming. Institutional culture may sometimes perceive auditors as antagonists rather than as citizens exercising lawful rights. Broad powers of stop, search, or detention (under PACE, the Terrorism Act, or the Public Order Act 1986) may be applied too broadly or without sufficient justification. Local or station-level policies may lag behind national guidance or current human-rights jurisprudence. The UK’s legal architecture — from the Petition of Right 1628 and Magna Cartas 1215-1297 to the HRA 1998, ECHR, and modern police-policy frameworks — clearly affirms the public’s right to film police officers in public without fear of reprisal. Yet, the experience of many auditors reveals a troubling gap between principle and practice. As policing institutions continue to champion transparency and accountability, it is imperative for both officers and public auditors to understand their respective rights and obligations. Without such mutual understanding, citizens who seek to lawfully observe state power may continue to face coercive or unlawful responses — a contradiction of the very rule-of-law principle that underpins policing in the United Kingdom. For further reference, see NPCC Guidance for Photographers , College of Policing Media Relations APP , Peck v UK , Perry v UK , and Mengesha v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis .

Vice President's, President, Reporters, Independent Journalists, Leader: Dwayne Hards. Dwayne Hards Leader, Independent Journalist The Leader of wcn is in charge and has the Final Say over decisions including over the president(s). Founder, Leader wcnnews.wixsite.com/news Dwayne Hards No President yet (Role Available) President The President is 2nd in charge and can only make decisions with the Leader's Assent. (elected) fair.democracies.department.wcn.uk@gmail.com President. - - No Vice President yet Vice President Vice Presidents are deputy presidents awaiting to be elected into president and Vice Presidents can make decisions for LCN with the President's assent which will then be referred to the Leader for Final Assent by the President. fair.democracies.department.wcn.uk@gmail.com Vice President. - - No Vice President yet Vice President Vice Presidents are deputy presidents awaiting to be elected into president and Vice Presidents can make decisions for LCN with the President's assent which will then be referred to the Leader for Final Assent by the President. Vice President - - fair.democracies.department.wcn.uk@gmail.com No President yet President Vice Presidents are deputy presidents awaiting to be elected into president and Vice Presidents can make decisions for LCN with the President's assent which will then be referred to the Leader for Final Assent by the President. Vice President. - - fair.democracies.department.wcn.uk@gmail.com No Vice President yet Vice President Vice Presidents are deputy presidents awaiting to be elected into president and Vice Presidents can make decisions for LCN with the President's assent which will then be referred to the Leader for Final Assent by the President. Vice President. - - fair.democracies.department.wcn.uk@gmail.com No Vice President yet Vice President Vice Presidents are deputy presidents awaiting to be elected into president and Vice Presidents can make decisions for LCN with the President's assent which will then be referred to the Leader for Final Assent by the President. fair.democracies.department.wcn.uk@gmail.com Vice President - - No Vice President yet Vice President Vice Presidents are deputy presidents awaiting to be elected into president and Vice Presidents can make decisions for LCN with the President's assent which will then be referred to the Leader for Final Assent by the President. fair.democracies.department.wcn.uk@gmail.com Vice President. - - No Vice President yet Vice President Vice Presidents are deputy presidents awaiting to be elected into president and Vice Presidents can make decisions for LCN with the President's assent which will then be referred to the Leader for Final Assent by the President. fair.democracies.department.wcn.uk@gmail.com Vice President. - - No Vice President yet Vice President Vice Presidents are deputy presidents awaiting to be elected into president and Vice Presidents can make decisions for LCN with the President's assent which will then be referred to the Leader for Final Assent by the President. fair.democracies.department.wcn.uk@gmail.com Vice President - - No Vice President yet Vice President Vice Presidents are deputy presidents awaiting to be elected into president and Vice Presidents can make decisions for LCN with the President's assent which will then be referred to the Leader for Final Assent by the President. fair.democracies.department.wcn.uk@gmail.com Vice President. - - No Vice President yet Vice President Vice Presidents are deputy presidents awaiting to be elected into president and Vice Presidents can make decisions for LCN with the President's assent which will then be referred to the Leader for Final Assent by the President. fair.democracies.department.wcn.uk@gmail.com Vice President. - - M--- ----- Sacked Reporter This Reporter Anonymous has been sacked for Negligence, Bullying, Immaturity Whilst Reporting under Sections (STMA20-1), (SD, SC). (TMA20) email.wcn.uk@gmail.com Sacked News Reporter No Reporter yet Reporter News Reporter, Reporting news for WCN, Reporters are wcn volunteers that write/help write articles for wcn. email.wcn.uk@gmail.com Reporter No Reporter yet Reporter News Reporter, Reporting news for WCN, Reporters are wcn volunteers that write/help write articles for wcn. email.wcn.uk@gmail.com Reporter No Reporter Yet Reporter News Reporter, Reporting news for WCN, Reporters are wcn volunteers that write/help write articles for wcn. email.wcn.uk@gmail.com Reporter No Reporter yet Reporter News Reporter, Reporting news for WCN, Reporters are wcn volunteers that write/help write articles for wcn. email.wcn.uk@gmail.com Reporter No Reporter yet Reporter News Reporter, Reporting news for WCN, Reporters are wcn volunteers that write/help write articles for wcn. email.wcn.uk@gmail.com Reporter Sussex Police Crime Investigators on LCN Police Force in the UK , Reports on LCN will be forwarded to Sussex for Police to investigate any criminal matter on LCN if the content is criminal. www.sussex.police.uk Police Force CEOP Child Exploitation and Online Protection Command Online Child Protection Agency , that will investigate any Reports on LCN involving crimes against children. ceop.police.uk Government Agency Lead Reporter No Head Reporter | (Available) Head Reporter , a HR is an LCN Reporter who can approve posts from Reporters on LCN and a HR can write Emergency Procedures (EP's) and a HR can also sign off Emergency Procedures. email.wcn.uk@gmail.com Head Reporter If you would like to apply for one of these positions please email email.wcn.uk@gmail.com , you must know the Leader in person to apply.

Advertise your Ad on Worthing County News Advertise: Advertisements are free on the Littlehampton Community News website. If you want your business, or other advertised, please email: email.wcn.uk@gmail.com . Any additional information. Normal Text Title Subtitle Normal Text Send Your Ad by clicking here

FREE BOOKS A Boys Life with Autism.pdf